Post-editing and the evolution of translators

Patrick Beßler 27 May 2021 8 min read
RWS post-edit machine translation

Machine translation (MT) is becoming an increasingly integral part of modern translation programs. The rapidly advancing development of machine translation technology—and the amount companies are investing—support this. Also, MT quality is getting better and better: the results have become increasingly fluent and accurate. But, despite technological advances, humans still need to be involved in fine-tuning MT output—particularly for high-value pieces of content. Here we look at post-editing, what it is, and some of the strategies you should consider when developing a post-editing program.  

What is post-editing?

It’s important to pause and consider the task of post-editing (PE). PE differs considerably from classic translation. It is actually a special form of review. A translator always aims to deliver a translated file that is as faithful as possible to the original, but a post-editor works differently.

There are generally two types of post-editing: light post-editing and full post-editing. In light post-editing, the focus is on ensuring that the target text correctly reflects the meaning of the source, so spelling or grammatical errors are of secondary importance. Even style is often overlooked unless the errors distort the meaning of the source. The most important consideration is whether the translation provides the reader with sufficient information. 

Whereas in full post-editing, the post-editor produces a translation that is at the same quality level as that of a human translation. 

Here is a list of the things a post-editor would correct when performing full post-editing:

  • Punctuation
  • Formatting/Tagging: ensuring that all tags used in the source text (e.g., for text formatting, cross-references, etc.) are present in the target text and in the correct locations.
  • Terminology: checking for appropriate use of industry- and client-specific terminology as well as correct use of proper names.
  • Fluency: checking and establishing readability to make the text as fluent and similar to human translation as possible.
  • Country specifics: adapting country-specific currencies, units of measurement, formats for dates, numbers, addresses and punctuation, cultural references and more. 
  • Style: adapting the style for the target audience and to client- and project-specific requirements. 

The three enterprise MT strategies

To better understand the practical application of PE, it’s important to explain scenarios of MT and TM applications that produce the “starting point” for the post-editor. So, when an enterprise deploys MT, there are several strategies that can be used:

1. Complete document pre-translation. The complete document is pre-translated. This means that all target segments up to a defined fuzzy match threshold are reused from the translation memory. All other segments are machine-translated. This way, the entire file is populated with translations from either the TM or the MT engine. From there, a post-editor edits the entire document, bringing it up to the required quality level.

2. Pre-translation into a translation memory. The post-editor receives a translation memory with the raw translations from the MT engine. In this way the translator gets an array of fuzzy matches that they can use to create the final output. The advantage of this method is that the post-editor does not have to edit pre-populated segments and can use the machine translations only when needed.

3. Interactive translation with on-the-fly MT support. As the post-editor types a translation, suggestions from the MT engine are offered for use. This gives the post-editor the greatest possible freedom in terms of wording because they are not starting with a populated response that they have to edit. Instead, they have more choices and control over the language used. 

The evolution from translation to post-editing

There are plenty of translators who are sceptical about machine translation and post-editing. Some fear for their jobs; others dislike the nature of post-editing work. But there is really no reason to fear. First, the use of machine translation is not suitable for all types of text. For texts that have “emotional weight”, idioms, puns, humour or complex content, MT can be so poor that a post-editor must fix everything—in which case, MT has no value. Machines can substitute words and groups of words from one language to another based on patterns taught to them through training, but they cannot handle all the aspects and complexities of human language. In addition, if there are errors or ambiguities in the source content, machines lack the judgment required to understand them and still produce a correct translation.

Post-editing will therefore not replace classic translation, as there are still cases where it’s better for a professional translator to start from scratch. It is simply an additional service that complements existing offerings.

However, the acceptance of and willingness to work with MT technology is important for success in this field. When translators are expected to learn how to post-edit, it is absolutely necessary to explain to them how machine translation works, where it can help and when it shouldn’t be used. Explain to them the nature of the errors that can occur. Also, provide them with guidelines on the levels of quality so they can calibrate their work accordingly. In addition, post-editors should be able to work in their familiar environment; i.e., they should be able to use the same tools that they use for classic translation. 

All this said, training alone does not makes someone a great post-editor. Post-editing skills are acquired through daily practice. Our experience shows that even the linguist who declares thousands of words of post-editing experience may be a problematic post-editor if the experience was acquired through very random tasks and over a very long period of time. Also, linguists whose experience dates is “older” than 2-3 years might not have the right understanding of the actual quality of today’s MT outputs.

In summary, translators can learn post-editing as an additional offering and skillset that makes them more marketable and available for more types of work.

How to become a post-editor

Becoming a post editor takes more than the usual webinars that are offered free of charge by many companies. Some language service providers offer in-house training for their employees or freelance translators. Also, some universities offer seminars on the topic.

Critical content includes:

  • A technical introduction to MT
  • The history of machine translation
  • Possible applications of MT and the associated decision criteria
  • The differences between post-editing for statistical-based MT (SMT) and neural MT (NMT); and
  • Practical post-editing exercises in both light and full PE techniques

That last point, practical exercises, is very important. These give the prospective post-editor the opportunity to ask questions and learn the nuances between the two types of post-editing first-hand.

In any case, training or other continuing education to become a post-editor is an investment in both the career of the translator and in the future of enterprise MT development and deployment. The increase in the use of MT will lead to a greater demand for post-editing, and there’s no going back. 

At RWS, post-editing is one of many areas we can help. So, if you’d like to set up a machine translation and post-editing program, get in touch!

Patrick Beßler

Patrick Beßler

Patrick is a researcher at RWS, and works closely with customers on their machine translation and post-editing programs.
All from Patrick Beßler